Sector: Industrials
VERALTO CORP · Meeting: May 13, 2026
Directors FOR
4
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
FOR
Election of Class III Directors
Ms. Filler passes all policy screens: no overboarding concern (holds 2 public board seats — Danaher and Carlyle Group), attendance is strong (directors collectively at 97%), and the TSR trigger does not fire because Veralto's 3-year return of +10.3% versus the peer group median of +42.1% represents a gap of -31.8pp, which is below the 35pp threshold required to trigger a No vote for a company with low-positive absolute TSR.
Ms. Honeycutt is the CEO and an executive director; she is subject to the same TSR trigger as other directors, but the 3-year peer group underperformance gap of -31.8pp does not reach the 35pp threshold required to trigger a No vote, so no TSR-based concern applies; no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues are present.
Mr. Mitts holds seats at Veralto and TE Connectivity (2 public boards), well below the 4-seat overboarding limit; the TSR underperformance gap of -31.8pp versus the peer group does not reach the 35pp trigger threshold; attendance and independence are satisfactory.
Mr. Williams holds seats at Veralto and Sherwin-Williams (2 public boards), below the overboarding limit; the TSR underperformance gap of -31.8pp versus the peer group does not reach the 35pp trigger threshold; attendance and independence are satisfactory.
All four Class III director nominees — Linda Filler, Jennifer L. Honeycutt, Heath A. Mitts, and Thomas L. Williams — receive a FOR vote. Veralto's 3-year stock return of +10.3% falls into the low-positive tier, which requires a peer group underperformance gap of at least 35 percentage points to trigger a No vote. The actual gap is -31.8pp, just below that threshold, so the TSR trigger does not fire for any director. No overboarding, independence, attendance, or qualification concerns are identified for any nominee.
CEO
Jennifer L. Honeycutt
Total Comp
$14,803,238
Prior Support
93%%
CEO total compensation of approximately $14.8 million is broadly in line with benchmarks for a CEO at a $21 billion industrials company, and the prior year say-on-pay vote received 93% support — well above the 70% threshold that would require a response. Pay structure is strong: 90.2% of the CEO's target pay is variable or performance-based (far exceeding the 50-60% policy minimum), with long-term equity making up the largest portion and incorporating rigorous metrics including 3-year relative total shareholder return versus the S&P 500 and a return on invested capital modifier. While Veralto's stock has lagged its sector peers over 3 years, the variable pay structure — including performance share awards that pay out based on relative stock performance — appropriately links executive outcomes to shareholder experience, and there is no evidence of above-benchmark incentive pay being awarded despite poor performance. The company also maintains a robust clawback policy that was expanded in 2025 beyond SEC requirements.
Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Tenure
3 yrs
Audit Fees
$8,750
Non-Audit Fees
$1,600
Ernst & Young has served as Veralto's auditor since the company's separation from Danaher in 2023, giving it approximately 3 years of tenure — well below the 25-year threshold that would raise independence concerns. Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $400k plus tax fees of $1,200k) total $1,600k against audit fees of $8,750k, a ratio of roughly 18%, comfortably below the 50% threshold. EY is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a $21 billion market-cap company. No restatement concerns are present.
Veralto's 2026 annual meeting presents a clean ballot with no significant governance red flags. All four Class III director nominees receive a FOR vote as the company's 3-year peer group underperformance gap of -31.8 percentage points falls just short of the 35-point trigger threshold; Ernst & Young is ratified on favorable fee ratios and short tenure; and the say-on-pay program earns a FOR based on strong pay-for-performance structure, high prior-year shareholder support of 93%, and a compensation design that puts more than 90% of CEO pay at risk.
16 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing