Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

STOKE THERAPEUTICS INC (STOK)

Sector: Health Care

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/STOK/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

STOKE THERAPEUTICS INC · Meeting: June 3, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Class I Directors

3 FOR
✓ FOR
G. Clare Kahn, Ph.D.

Dr. Kahn joined the board in March 2026, well within the 24-month new-director exemption from the stock performance trigger, and brings deep regulatory and pharmaceutical expertise from senior roles at Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline; no overboarding, attendance, or independence concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Adrian R. Krainer, Ph.D.

Dr. Krainer is a co-founder with board tenure since 2014 and deep RNA-splicing scientific expertise directly relevant to Stoke's platform; the stock performance trigger does not apply because STOK's 3-year return of +297.8% outperforms the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF by +229.0 percentage points, far exceeding the 65-percentage-point threshold required to trigger an against vote.

✓ FOR
Julie Anne Smith

Ms. Smith is a seasoned biotech executive with multiple CEO roles at rare-disease companies and currently serves on the board of Exelixis; the stock performance trigger does not apply given STOK's exceptional outperformance of XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF, and no overboarding, attendance, or independence concerns are identified.

All three Class I nominees pass all policy screens: the TSR trigger does not fire because STOK's 3-year return of +297.8% outperforms the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF by +229.0 percentage points, which is well above the 65-percentage-point threshold that would be required to trigger an against vote; Dr. Kahn is protected by the 24-month new-director exemption; no overboarding, attendance failures, or independence issues are present.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Ian F. Smith

Total Comp

$27,031,655

Prior Support

N/A

⚑ CEO total compensation of $27,031,655 is heavily driven by a large one-time equity grant tied to a new CEO appointment, but the reported value far exceeds typical benchmarks for a $2.1B biotech CEO⚑ CEO pay mix: base salary of $170,625 represents less than 1% of total compensation — equity awards alone totaled over $25.6 million in reported value, suggesting a single large front-loaded grant covering multiple future years reported all at once⚑ CEO total pay >+30% above benchmark for a biotech CEO at this market cap band, triggering the aggregate pay threshold

CEO Ian F. Smith received total reported compensation of $27,031,655 for 2025, the vast majority of which came from a single large equity grant of stock options and restricted stock units awarded when he was appointed permanent CEO in October 2025 — this is a front-loaded grant covering multiple future years but reported entirely in the current year, and its reported value of approximately $25.6 million substantially exceeds typical compensation benchmarks for a biotech CEO at a $2.1 billion company, triggering the policy's greater-than-30% above benchmark threshold. While the stock has performed exceptionally well — up nearly 298% over three years versus the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF — the pay-for-performance alignment check cannot fully excuse the absolute magnitude of the grant because the company's pay disclosure does not provide a sufficiently transparent multi-year framework that would allow shareholders to evaluate whether this level of compensation is justified by a clearly articulated long-term incentive structure. Non-CEO named executive officers (Leggett and Hoitt) received total compensation of approximately $1.8 million and $2.3 million respectively, which appear reasonable for their roles, but the CEO pay package alone drives an against vote on the overall program.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

0 yrs

Audit Fees

$854,000

Non-Audit Fees

$29,000

EY is a newly appointed Big 4 firm with no prior tenure at Stoke, replacing KPMG which served only two years with a clean audit record and no disagreements; non-audit fees paid to KPMG in 2025 were $29,000 versus audit fees of $854,000, a non-audit ratio of approximately 3.4%, well below the 50% threshold that would trigger a no vote.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Stoke Therapeutics annual meeting presents a clean director slate with strong stock performance that easily clears the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF benchmark, and a newly appointed Big 4 auditor with minimal non-audit fees, both of which receive FOR votes; however, the Say on Pay proposal receives an AGAINST vote because the CEO's reported total compensation of over $27 million — driven by a single large front-loaded equity grant at the time of his permanent appointment — exceeds typical benchmarks for a biotech company of this size by a margin that triggers the policy's pay level threshold, even accounting for the company's exceptional stock performance.

Filing date: April 22, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence