SHOALS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC CLAS (SHLS)

Sector: Industrials

    Home/Companies/SHLS/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

SHOALS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC CLAS · Meeting: April 30, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

1

Directors AGAINST

4

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Five Director Nominees to Serve Until the 2027 Annual Meeting

1 FOR/4 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Ty Daul3-year TSR trigger: SHLS -69.2% vs peer median -19.9%, gap of -49.3pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director joined March 2021, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year TSR does not provide mitigant (-81.1% vs peer median -40.8%, gap -40.3pp exceeds 20pp threshold)

Mr. Daul has served since March 2021, meaning his entire tenure covers the period during which Shoals' stock fell roughly 69% over three years while the company's own compensation peer group declined only about 20% — a gap of 49 percentage points that far exceeds the 20-point trigger threshold for companies with negative absolute stock returns; the five-year record is equally poor, so there is no longer-term track record to offset the recent decline.

✗ AGAINST
Jeannette Mills3-year TSR trigger: SHLS -69.2% vs peer median -19.9%, gap of -49.3pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director joined August 2022, tenure overlaps majority of underperformance period; 5-year TSR does not provide mitigant

Ms. Mills joined the board in August 2022, so she has been on the board for more than two years and her tenure meaningfully overlaps the period of severe underperformance; Shoals' stock dropped roughly 69% over three years compared to a roughly 20% decline for the peer group, a gap nearly 50 percentage points above the 20-point policy trigger, and the five-year picture is similarly weak.

✗ AGAINST
Lori Sundberg3-year TSR trigger: SHLS -69.2% vs peer median -19.9%, gap of -49.3pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director joined March 2021, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year TSR does not provide mitigant

Ms. Sundberg has served since March 2021, her entire tenure overlaps the severe underperformance period where Shoals' stock lost roughly 69% over three years while peers fell only about 20%, and the five-year record shows a similarly large gap, so neither the short- nor long-term performance record provides a reason to set aside the trigger.

✗ AGAINST
Toni Volpe3-year TSR trigger: SHLS -69.2% vs peer median -19.9%, gap of -49.3pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director joined March 2021, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year TSR does not provide mitigant

Mr. Volpe has served since March 2021, fully covering the underperformance period; Shoals' stock declined about 69% over three years versus a roughly 20% peer median decline — a gap of nearly 50 percentage points well above the 20-point threshold — and the five-year comparison is equally unfavorable, providing no mitigating offset.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Niharika Taskar Ramdevdirector joined 2024 — within 24-month new director exemption

Ms. Ramdev joined the board in 2024, which is within the 24-month window during which new directors are exempt from the stock performance trigger, giving her reasonable time to contribute before being held accountable for prior-period results.

Four of the five nominees (Daul, Mills, Sundberg, Volpe) have tenures that materially overlap Shoals' severe three-year stock underperformance — the company's shares fell roughly 69% while its own compensation peer group fell only about 20%, a gap of nearly 50 percentage points that far exceeds the 20-point policy trigger for companies with negative absolute returns. The five-year picture is equally poor, so the longer-term mitigant does not apply. Only Ms. Ramdev, who joined in 2024 and is within the 24-month new-director exemption, receives a FOR vote.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Brandon Moss

Total Comp

$5,961,218

Prior Support

61%%

prior Say on Pay support of 61% is below 70% threshold — triggered further review; company made visible responsive changes for 2025 and 2026

The CEO's total reported pay for 2025 was approximately $5.96 million, which is reasonable for a CEO at a roughly $1 billion technology-sector company, and the pay mix is appropriately structured — 52% of target compensation is performance-based and 87% is at risk, satisfying the policy's requirement that the majority of senior executive pay be variable. While last year's shareholder vote came in at only 61% support (below the 70% threshold that triggers a No vote absent responsive action), the company took visible and substantive steps in response: it eliminated one-time off-cycle awards for 2025, engaged directly with shareholders representing roughly 50% of ownership, and committed to returning to a single full-year bonus measurement period and multi-year performance stock award cycles for 2026 — meaningful structural improvements that satisfy the policy's requirement for visible change. The long-term incentive plan also includes a meaningful three-year total shareholder return modifier on performance stock awards, and the realized pay record shows executives received only 7.4% of target on completed long-term award cycles, demonstrating that the incentive structure has genuinely penalized executives for the company's poor stock performance.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

1 yrs

Audit Fees

$1,070,000

Non-Audit Fees

$3,600

Ernst & Young LLP was newly appointed for fiscal year 2025 (replacing BDO USA, P.C.), so its tenure is approximately one year — well below the 25-year concern threshold. Non-audit fees paid to EY were only $3,600 (a small software subscription) against $1,070,000 in audit fees, a ratio of less than 1%, which is far below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns. EY is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Shoals' size.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Shoals ballot presents a split outcome: the auditor ratification and Say on Pay proposals both pass policy review (EY is newly appointed with negligible non-audit fees, and the compensation program has a defensible structure with demonstrated pay-for-performance consequences), but four of the five director nominees standing for election receive AGAINST votes because their tenures fully cover a period of severe stock underperformance — Shoals' shares fell roughly 69% over three years while its own peer group fell only about 20%, a gap that far exceeds the policy trigger and is not offset by the five-year record. Only newly appointed director Niharika Taskar Ramdev is exempt from the performance trigger.

Filing date: March 20, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

14 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

AMPSAltus Power, Inc.
AMRCAmeresco, Inc.
AMSCAmerican Superconductor Corporation
ARRYArray Technologies, Inc.
ESEESCO Technologies Inc.
FLNCFluence Energy, Inc.
ROCKGibraltar Industries, Inc.
HLIOHelios Technologies, Inc.
LFUSLittelfuse, Inc.
NXTNextracker Inc.
POWIPower Integrations, Inc.
ROGRogers Corporation
SEDGSolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
RUNSunrun Inc.