SANA BIOTECHNOLOGY INC (SANA)

Sector: Health Care

    Home/Companies/SANA/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

SANA BIOTECHNOLOGY INC · Meeting: June 4, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

0

Directors AGAINST

3

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Three Class II Directors

/3 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Hans E. BishopTSR underperformance 3yr: SANA -34.5% vs XBI +65.6%, gap of -100.1pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR5yr TSR mitigant does not apply: 5yr SANA -87.0% vs XBI, gap far exceeds thresholdDirector since 2018, full tenure overlap with underperformance period

Mr. Bishop has served on the board since 2018 and bears full accountability for SANA's severe stock underperformance: over the past three years the stock has lost about 35% while the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF gained about 66%, a gap of roughly 100 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-percentage-point trigger for companies with negative absolute returns; the five-year record (stock down 87%) confirms this is sustained underperformance, not a temporary dip, so the five-year mitigant does not rescue the vote.

✗ AGAINST
Robert NelsenTSR underperformance 3yr: SANA -34.5% vs XBI +65.6%, gap of -100.1pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR5yr TSR mitigant does not apply: 5yr SANA -87.0% vs XBI, gap far exceeds thresholdDirector since 2018, full tenure overlap with underperformance period

Mr. Nelsen has served on the board since 2018 and, like Mr. Bishop, is fully accountable for the period of severe underperformance: SANA's three-year return of -34.5% trails the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF's +65.6% by about 100 percentage points, well above the 30-percentage-point trigger, and the five-year record (stock down 87%) shows this is not a short-term anomaly, so the five-year mitigant does not apply.

✗ AGAINST
Alise S. Reicin, M.D.TSR underperformance 3yr: SANA -34.5% vs XBI +65.6%, gap of -100.1pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR5yr TSR mitigant does not apply: 5yr SANA -87.0% vs XBI, gap far exceeds thresholdDirector since December 2020, tenure meaningfully overlaps with underperformance period (over 3 years)

Dr. Reicin joined the board in December 2020 and has served for over three years, giving her substantial tenure overlap with the period of severe stock underperformance; SANA's three-year return of -34.5% trails the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF by roughly 100 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-percentage-point trigger, and the five-year record confirms sustained underperformance so no mitigant applies.

For Analysis

All three Class II nominees — Hans E. Bishop, Robert Nelsen, and Alise S. Reicin, M.D. — receive an AGAINST vote due to SANA's severe and sustained stock underperformance during their tenures: the company's three-year price return of -34.5% trails the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF by approximately 100 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-percentage-point trigger applicable to companies with negative absolute returns, and the five-year record (-87%) confirms this is not a transient dip that would trigger the mitigant provision.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Steven D. Harr, M.D.

Total Comp

$2,903,010

Prior Support

N/A

no formal say on pay vote: company is an emerging growth company and not required to hold a Say on Pay vote; this analysis is applied to the compensation structure as disclosed

SANA is an emerging growth company and does not hold a formal advisory vote on executive pay, so there is no prior-year vote result to consider. The CEO's total reported compensation for 2025 was approximately $2.9 million — a substantial decrease from $8.8 million in 2024 — reflecting lower equity award values driven by a lower stock price, which shows some responsiveness to company performance. The pay mix is acceptable: base salary of $696,140 represents about 24% of total compensation, with the remainder in variable and equity-based pay including stock options, restricted stock units, and a performance-based cash bonus paid at 107.5% of target based on disclosed clinical and manufacturing milestones, and the company has adopted a compliant clawback policy as required by Dodd-Frank.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

7 yrs

Audit Fees

$1,453,000

Non-Audit Fees

$70,000

EY has served as SANA's auditor since 2019 (approximately seven years), well below the 25-year threshold that would raise tenure concerns; non-audit fees (tax services of $70,000) represent only about 4.8% of audit fees ($1,453,000), far below the 50% level that would signal an independence concern; and EY is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of SANA's size and complexity.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Sana Biotechnology annual meeting features two standard proposals: director elections and auditor ratification; Say on Pay is not on the ballot because the company qualifies as an emerging growth company exempt from that requirement. All three Class II director nominees receive an AGAINST vote due to SANA's severe and sustained underperformance versus the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (roughly -100 percentage points over three years on a negative absolute return), while the auditor ratification earns a FOR vote given EY's short tenure, minimal non-audit fees, and Big 4 status.

Filing date: April 24, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence