RAYONIER ADVANCED MATERIALS INC (RYAM)

Sector: Materials

    Home/Companies/RYAM/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

RAYONIER ADVANCED MATERIALS INC · Meeting: May 13, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Elect the Board's three nominees for Class III directors for terms expiring in 2029

3 FOR
✓ FOR
Charles R. Eggert

Eggert has served since 2022 (about 4 years), giving him meaningful but limited tenure overlap with the performance period; RYAM's 3-year price return is +80.3%, which is a strong positive result, and the filing's named compensation peer group is used as the primary TSR benchmark — without precise peer-group median TSR data confirming underperformance of 65pp or more against that peer group, the TSR trigger does not fire, and no other disqualifying flags (overboarding, attendance, independence) are present.

✓ FOR
David C. Mariano

Mariano has served since 2020, overlapping the full 3-year measurement period; however, RYAM's absolute 3-year price return is +80.3% (strong positive territory), meaning the named-peer underperformance threshold would need to be 65pp or more for a No vote, and no evidence in the filing confirms that level of underperformance against the disclosed peer group — no other disqualifying flags are present.

✓ FOR
Scott M. Sutton

Sutton joined the board in January 2026, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so the TSR trigger does not apply to him; his qualifications — extensive specialty chemicals CEO experience — are clearly relevant to RYAM's business.

All three Class III nominees pass the policy screens. Sutton is exempt from the TSR trigger as a new director. Eggert and Mariano serve during a period of strong absolute stock price recovery (+80.3% over 3 years), and without confirmed peer-group underperformance exceeding the 65pp threshold applicable in strong-positive-return scenarios, the TSR trigger does not fire for either. No attendance, overboarding, independence, or qualification concerns are identified for any nominee.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

De Lyle Bloomquist

Total Comp

$5,138,573

Prior Support

98%%

The CEO's total reported compensation was approximately $5.1 million, which is reasonable for a small-cap Basic Materials company CEO and does not appear to exceed the +20% individual benchmark threshold. The pay structure is heavily variable — base salary of $1,000,000 represents roughly 19% of total compensation, with the remaining ~81% in performance-based equity awards and incentive cash, well exceeding the 50-60% variable pay minimum. Critically, the company demonstrated meaningful pay-for-performance discipline: no annual cash bonuses were paid on the financial metrics (Adjusted EBITDA and Operating Cash Flow both missed threshold), and the long-term incentive program uses relative TSR and cumulative EBITDA over a three-year period as vesting conditions — the compensation that was paid reflected the partial achievement that actually occurred, not a windfall. The clawback policy meets Dodd-Frank requirements and extends to detrimental conduct, and the prior year saw 98% shareholder support with no governance concerns raised.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Grant Thornton LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

N/A

Non-Audit Fees

N/A

The proxy does not disclose the fee breakdown in the extracted text provided, so the non-audit fee ratio trigger cannot be confirmed; per policy, when tenure is not disclosed the tenure trigger does not fire, and no material restatement attributable to audit failure is identified — the default FOR vote applies. Note: Grant Thornton is a large national firm appropriate for a company of RYAM's approximately $690M market cap.

Stockholder Proposals

2 proposals submitted by shareholders

Proposal 2

Approval of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify the Board of Directors

✓ FOR
Filed by:Board of Directors (management proposal)OtherCharter Amendment
Board recommends: FOR
governance improvementboard declassificationshareholder accountability

Declassifying the board is a mainstream governance improvement that directly strengthens shareholder rights by requiring all directors to stand for election annually rather than on staggered three-year terms. The proposal moves from the current classified structure (where shareholders can only vote on one-third of the board each year) to full annual elections by 2029, which increases board accountability. This is a clear improvement to the current baseline and should be supported.

Proposal 3

Approval of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Eliminate the Supermajority Voting Provisions

✓ FOR
Filed by:Board of Directors (management proposal)OtherCharter Amendment
Board recommends: FOR
governance improvementsupermajority eliminationshareholder rights

Eliminating the 80% supermajority voting requirement and replacing it with a simple majority standard is a clear shareholder-friendly governance improvement. Supermajority requirements make it extremely difficult for shareholders to change governance provisions even when a strong majority supports change — a simple majority standard is the market norm and gives shareholders a more meaningful voice. This proposal is straightforward to support.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 RYAM annual meeting ballot is straightforward with no significant governance concerns — all three director nominees pass policy screens, the pay program demonstrated genuine pay-for-performance discipline by withholding bonuses when financial targets were missed, and both charter amendment proposals (board declassification and supermajority elimination) are clear improvements to shareholder rights that warrant support. The main governance context is a company navigating a difficult 2025 financial year with a new CEO in place and meaningful governance upgrades being proposed.

Filing date: March 30, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence

Compensation Peer Group

1 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

^SML__INDEX_BENCHMARK__:S&P SmallCap 600 Index