ARCUS BIOSCIENCES INC (RCUS)

Sector: Health Care

    Home/Companies/RCUS/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

ARCUS BIOSCIENCES INC · Meeting: June 11, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

4

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors — Four Class II Director Nominees

4 FOR
✓ FOR
Dietmar Berger, M.D., Ph.D.

Dr. Berger joined the board in February 2025 — less than 24 months ago — so he is exempt from the TSR trigger under policy; he brings strong clinical development credentials as Chief Medical Officer of Gilead Sciences, and no other disqualifying flags apply.

✓ FOR
David Lacey, M.D.

RCUS's 3-year total shareholder return of +29.3% is strong positive, and the gap versus the company-disclosed peer group median is +65.6pp, which does not exceed the 65pp threshold required to trigger a vote against under our policy; Dr. Lacey has deep drug discovery expertise and no overboarding, attendance, or independence concerns.

✓ FOR
Nicole Lambert

The peer-group TSR comparison shows RCUS outperforming its disclosed peer median by +65.6pp over three years, just at the 65pp threshold which does not trigger a vote against; Ms. Lambert has relevant commercial and operational experience in genomics and oncology, and no other disqualifying flags apply.

✓ FOR
Johanna Mercier

Ms. Mercier joined the board in January 2024, giving her just over 24 months of tenure, which is at the borderline of the 24-month exemption; in any case, the peer-group TSR gap of +65.6pp does not exceed the 65pp threshold, so the TSR trigger does not fire, and her extensive commercial experience at Gilead and Bristol-Myers Squibb is directly relevant to Arcus's stage of development.

All four Class II nominees pass policy screens: RCUS's 3-year stock return of +29.3% places it in the strong-positive tier, and outperformance versus the company-disclosed peer group median (+65.6pp) just meets but does not exceed the 65pp trigger threshold; Dr. Berger is additionally exempt as a director of less than 24 months; no overboarding, attendance below 75%, independence, or qualification concerns were identified for any nominee.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Terry Rosen, Ph.D.

Total Comp

$9,656,813

Prior Support

94%%

The prior year say-on-pay vote received approximately 94% support, well above the 70% threshold that would require a response, and the company made no significant structural changes — which is appropriate given that level of shareholder endorsement. CEO total compensation of approximately $9.7 million for 2025 is reasonable for a late-clinical-stage biotech of Arcus's size and complexity, and the pay mix is heavily weighted toward equity (stock options at roughly 67% and restricted stock units at roughly 33% of equity value), meaning the large majority of compensation is variable and tied to stock price performance. The company's 1-year stock return of +218% and 3-year return of +29.3% both demonstrate meaningful shareholder value creation during the CEO's tenure, supporting the view that above-benchmark variable pay was earned rather than simply awarded.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

10 yrs

Audit Fees

$2,027,000

Non-Audit Fees

$53,000

Non-audit fees (tax compliance fees of $48,000 plus other fees of $5,000 = $53,000) represent approximately 2.6% of audit fees ($2,027,000), well below the 50% threshold that would trigger a concern about auditor independence; Ernst & Young has audited Arcus since 2016 — roughly 10 years — which is well below the 25-year tenure threshold; no material restatements were identified; and Ernst & Young is a Big 4 firm fully appropriate for a $3.1 billion market-cap company.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Arcus Biosciences annual meeting presents three standard proposals — director elections, auditor ratification, and say-on-pay — all of which pass policy screens and receive a FOR determination. The company's strong recent stock performance (up 218% over one year and outperforming its disclosed peer group over three years), a clean auditor fee profile with minimal non-audit work, and a 94% prior-year say-on-pay vote together support a straightforward FOR ballot across all proposals.

Filing date: April 21, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

17 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

ALECAlector, Inc.
ALLOAllogene Therapeutics, Inc.
ARWRArrowhead Pharmaceutics, Inc.
ARVNArvinas
BBIOBridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
DAWNDay One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
DNLIDenali Therapeutics Inc.
EDITEditas Medicine, Inc.
IBRXImmunityBio, Inc.
Intella Therapeutics Inc.
IOVAIovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
KURAKura Oncology, Inc.
PRTAProthena Corporation Plc
RGNXREGENXBIO Inc.
SWTXSpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.
SNDXSyndax Pharmaceuticals Inc.
XNCRXencor Inc.