MATIV HOLDINGS INC (MATV)

Sector: Materials

    Home/Companies/MATV/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

MATIV HOLDINGS INC · Meeting: April 30, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

0

Directors AGAINST

2

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

AGAINST

Director Elections

Election of Directors

/2 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
William M. Cook3-year TSR underperformance trigger: MATV -56.9% vs peer median +37.4%, gap of -94.3pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5-year TSR also fails: MATV -77.6% vs peer median +26.4%, gap of -104.0pp exceeds 20pp thresholddirector since 2022, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period

Mr. Cook has served on the board since 2022, meaning his tenure fully overlaps the period during which Mativ's stock fell roughly 57% while its own disclosed peer group of 24 companies gained an average of 37% — a gap of 94 percentage points, far exceeding the 20-point trigger that applies when a company's stock has declined in absolute terms; the 5-year record is equally poor (gap of 104 percentage points), so the longer-term check does not rescue a FOR vote.

✗ AGAINST
Marco Levi3-year TSR underperformance trigger: MATV -56.9% vs peer median +37.4%, gap of -94.3pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5-year TSR also fails: MATV -77.6% vs peer median +26.4%, gap of -104.0pp exceeds 20pp thresholddirector since 2016, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period

Mr. Levi has served on the board since 2016, giving him the longest tenure of any director; Mativ's stock has lost roughly 57% over the past three years while peers gained 37% on average — a 94-percentage-point gap that far exceeds the 20-point trigger for companies with negative absolute returns — and the 5-year record is worse still (gap of 104 percentage points), leaving no mitigating long-term track record that would justify a FOR vote.

For Analysis

Both director nominees trigger the policy's stock-performance test: Mativ's 3-year total return of -56.9% trails its own disclosed peer group median of +37.4% by 94 percentage points, well above the 20-point threshold that applies when a company's stock has fallen in absolute terms; the 5-year check confirms sustained underperformance rather than a temporary trough, so no mitigation applies. Both Cook and Levi have served long enough that their tenure fully overlaps the underperformance period.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Shruti Singhal

Total Comp

$3,256,333

Prior Support

96%%

CEO Shruti Singhal received total compensation of approximately $3.26 million for 2025, a year in which he only joined as CEO in mid-March and was compensated under a special one-year offer letter rather than the standard executive program; this compensation level is reasonable for a newly appointed CEO of a roughly $450 million market-cap specialty materials company, and the structure — primarily a one-year cliff-vesting stock award worth $2.1 million — ties the majority of pay directly to the company's stock price. The prior year say-on-pay vote received 96% support, well above the 70% threshold that would require corrective action, and the compensation program features meaningful performance conditions (free cash flow, ROIC, and relative TSR modifier on long-term awards) alongside a robust clawback policy, so no policy trigger is met.

Auditor Ratification

✗ AGAINST

Auditor

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$3,352,080

Non-Audit Fees

$1,114,746

The non-audit fees paid to Deloitte in 2025 (tax compliance of $198,628, tax consulting of $906,196, and other fees of $9,922, totaling approximately $1.11 million) represent about 33% of the $3.35 million audit fee, which is comfortably below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; auditor tenure is not disclosed in the proxy so the tenure trigger cannot fire; and Deloitte is a Big 4 firm fully appropriate for a company of Mativ's size, so no policy trigger is met and ratification is supported.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Mativ Holdings annual meeting presents a ballot where the key concern is severe and sustained stock underperformance: over three years the stock has lost roughly 57% while the company's own disclosed peer group gained 37%, a gap of 94 percentage points that triggers AGAINST votes on both director nominees standing for election; the auditor ratification passes cleanly on fees and the say-on-pay vote is supported given the new CEO's reasonable and performance-linked compensation structure under a transitional offer letter.

Filing date: March 17, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

24 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

AINAlbany International Corp.
AVNTAvient Corporation
AZZAZZ Inc.
CLWClearwater Paper Corporation
CMCOColumbus McKinnon Corporation
CRCrane Company
DLXDeluxe Corporation
DCIDonaldson Company, Inc.
NPOEnpro Inc.
FELEFranklin Electric Co., Inc.
GTESGates Industrial Corporation plc
GGGGraco Inc.
GEFGreif, Inc.
HIHillenbrand, Inc.
IEXIDEX Corporation
ITTITT Inc.
JBTMJBT Marel Corporation
KMTKennametal Inc.
MAGNMagnera Corporation
MWAMueller Water Products, Inc.
NDSNNordson Corporation
RYAMRayonier Advanced Materials, Inc.
RBCRBC Bearings International
SPXCSPX Technologies, Inc.