Sector: Consumer Discretionary
LKQ CORP · Meeting: May 6, 2026
Directors FOR
5
Directors AGAINST
3
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
AGAINST
Election of Our Board of Directors
Against Analysis
Jude has served on the board since approximately July 2024 (about 1.9 years), just outside the 24-month exemption threshold; as CEO and director he is subject to the TSR trigger — LKQ's 3-year price return is -41.7% (negative absolute TSR), and the stock has underperformed the XLY sector ETF benchmark by -101.3 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-point threshold required to trigger a vote against under the ETF fallback; the proxy discloses a named peer group (used for compensation) but no peer-group TSR data is provided, so the ETF fallback applies, and the trigger fires decisively; a 5-year check does not rescue the vote as LKQ's 5-year return is also negative (-22.4%), meaning the underperformance is not a brief recent dip but a sustained trend.
Mendel has served on the board for approximately 7.6 years, well beyond the 24-month exemption; LKQ's 3-year price return is -41.7% (negative absolute TSR) and the stock has underperformed the XLY ETF by -101.3 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-point trigger threshold; the 5-year return is also negative (-22.4%), confirming this is sustained rather than transient underperformance, so the 5-year mitigant does not apply.
Urbain has served on the board for approximately 6.3 years, well beyond the 24-month exemption; LKQ's 3-year price return is -41.7% (negative absolute TSR) and the stock has underperformed the XLY ETF by -101.3 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-point trigger threshold; the 5-year return is also negative (-22.4%), so the 5-year mitigant does not apply and the vote remains AGAINST.
For Analysis
Clarke joined in mid-2024 (approximately 1.7 years ago), which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not apply; he has strong logistics and CFO experience relevant to LKQ's operations.
Divitto joined in mid-2024 (approximately 1.1 years ago), well within the 24-month new-director exemption, so the TSR trigger does not apply; her automotive technology and digital innovation background is relevant to LKQ's strategy.
Gove joined on February 5, 2025 (approximately 1.1 years ago), well within the 24-month new-director exemption, so the TSR trigger does not apply; she brings CEO, CFO, and COO experience and qualifies as an audit committee financial expert.
Metcalf joined in approximately late 2024 (approximately 1.3 years ago), within the 24-month new-director exemption, so the TSR trigger does not apply; he brings public company CEO experience and strong operational and governance credentials.
Powell joined on February 5, 2025 (approximately 1.1 years ago), well within the 24-month new-director exemption, so the TSR trigger does not apply; his deep insurance industry expertise at Progressive is directly relevant to LKQ's auto parts business.
Of the eight nominees, three long-tenured directors (Jude, Mendel, and Urbain, with 1.9, 7.6, and 6.3 years of board tenure respectively) trigger a vote AGAINST based on LKQ's severe stock underperformance — the stock has fallen 41.7% over three years while the XLY consumer cyclical ETF rose 59.6%, a gap of over 100 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point threshold for companies with negative absolute returns; the five remaining nominees are within the 24-month new-director exemption and receive a FOR vote.
CEO
Justin Jude
Total Comp
$8,767,864
Prior Support
95%%
CEO Justin Jude received total compensation of approximately $8.8 million in 2025, which is within a reasonable range for a CEO of a $7.5 billion market cap consumer cyclical company with global operations; approximately 89% of his target pay was incentive-based (well above the 50-60% threshold required by policy), with equity awards tied to measurable multi-year performance goals including earnings per share, organic revenue growth, and return on invested capital, and annual bonuses that paid out at only 80% of target reflecting actual business performance falling short in some areas; the prior year say-on-pay vote received 95% support, no structural concerns were identified, and the company maintains a robust clawback policy as required by Dodd-Frank, so the pay program structure passes all policy screens despite the company's poor recent stock performance.
Auditor
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Tenure
28 yrs
Audit Fees
$9,571,550
Non-Audit Fees
$1,570,050
Deloitte has audited LKQ since 1998, giving it approximately 28 years of continuous tenure, which exceeds the 25-year threshold in our policy; the non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $228,550 plus tax fees of $1,341,500 totaling $1,570,050) represent approximately 16% of core audit fees ($9,571,550), which is well within the 50% limit and does not raise independence concerns on its own; however, the unusually long tenure raises serious questions about whether the auditor can maintain the independence and professional skepticism needed to challenge management, and while the company acknowledges this risk and notes active monitoring, it does not provide a compelling rotation plan or other concrete mitigation sufficient to overcome the policy trigger.
1 proposal submitted by shareholders
Proposal 4
This proposal improves shareholder rights by moving LKQ from a state where only the President or Board could call special meetings to one where holders of 25% of shares can demand a special meeting — a clear and meaningful governance upgrade; the 25% ownership threshold is consistent with market practice and strikes a reasonable balance between giving shareholders a meaningful voice and preventing small minorities from causing repeated disruptive meetings; the board is directly responding to a 2025 advisory vote in favor of this right, demonstrating appropriate responsiveness to shareholders, and supporting this transition is the correct governance outcome.
LKQ's 2026 proxy presents a mixed ballot: three long-tenured directors (including the CEO) receive AGAINST votes due to LKQ's severe multi-year stock underperformance versus the XLY consumer cyclical ETF, while the Say on Pay vote earns a FOR based on a well-structured incentive-heavy pay program; the auditor also receives an AGAINST vote due to Deloitte's 28-year tenure exceeding our 25-year independence threshold, but the charter amendment granting stockholders a 25% special meeting right is a genuine governance improvement and earns a FOR.
18 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing