BOWHEAD SPECIALTY HOLDINGS INC (BOW)

Sector: Financials

    Home/Companies/BOW/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

BOWHEAD SPECIALTY HOLDINGS INC · Meeting: April 30, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

2

Directors AGAINST

2

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Four Class II Directors to Serve for a Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2029 Annual Meeting

2 FOR/2 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
David FoyTSR underperformance trigger: BOW 3-year return -7.4% vs XLF +64.1%, gap of -71.5pp exceeds the 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; tenure since May 2024 exceeds 24-month exemption thresholdfamilial relationship flag not applicableno attendance issue

Mr. Foy joined in May 2024 and his tenure now exceeds 24 months, making him subject to the stock performance test; BOW's 3-year return of -7.4% trails the XLF financial sector ETF by 71.5 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-point threshold that applies when a stock has delivered a negative absolute return, and the 5-year return is identical (-7.4%) so there is no longer-term track record to mitigate this finding.

✗ AGAINST
David HolmanTSR underperformance trigger: BOW 3-year return -7.4% vs XLF +64.1%, gap of -71.5pp exceeds the 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; tenure since May 2024 exceeds 24-month exemption threshold

Mr. Holman joined in May 2024 and his tenure now exceeds 24 months, making him subject to the stock performance test; BOW's 3-year return of -7.4% trails the XLF financial sector ETF by 71.5 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-point threshold that applies when a stock has delivered a negative absolute return, and the 5-year return is identical so there is no mitigating longer-term track record.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Zhak Cohen

Mr. Cohen joined the board in May 2024, which is within the 24-month exemption window under our policy, so he is exempt from the stock performance trigger regardless of BOW's underperformance versus the XLF benchmark.

✓ FOR
Price Lowenstein

Mr. Lowenstein joined the board in October 2025, well within the 24-month new-director exemption, so he is not subject to the stock performance trigger and no other policy concerns are identified.

Two of the four Class II nominees (Foy and Holman) draw AGAINST votes because they have served more than 24 months and BOW's stock has lost roughly 7% over three years while the XLF financial-sector ETF gained 64%, a gap of 71.5 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point trigger threshold for companies with negative absolute returns; the 5-year return is the same as the 3-year, so no long-term mitigant applies. Cohen and Lowenstein are exempt as directors who joined within the past 24 months.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Stephen Sills

Total Comp

$4,309,280

Prior Support

N/A

CEO Stephen Sills received total compensation of approximately $4.3 million in 2025, which is within a reasonable range for a CEO of a specialty insurance company with roughly $700 million in market capitalization, and the pay structure is appropriately weighted toward variable pay — equity awards and a performance bonus make up the majority of his total pay, with base salary of $675,000 representing only about 16% of the total. The company's performance-based stock awards (PSUs) for the CEO are tied to meaningful stock price growth targets over a three-year period (requiring at least 15% compound annual growth to earn any PSUs), which is a genuine performance condition that links executive pay to shareholder outcomes. While BOW's stock has underperformed materially, the incentive structure itself is properly designed, the pay level is not excessively above benchmark, and there is no history of prior Say on Pay votes to flag, so a FOR vote is warranted on the program structure.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

4 yrs

Audit Fees

$1,680,000

Non-Audit Fees

$2,000

PwC has audited Bowhead since 2022 (approximately 4 years), well below the 25-year tenure threshold that would raise independence concerns, and non-audit fees of $2,000 represent less than 0.1% of audit fees of $1,680,000, far below the 50% ratio that would trigger a concern; PwC is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of this size and complexity.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Bowhead Specialty annual meeting has two standard proposals on the ballot — director elections and auditor ratification — with no Say on Pay vote formally listed on the agenda (the compensation discussion is present but no advisory vote proposal is included in the meeting notice); we vote AGAINST David Foy and David Holman among the four Class II director nominees because BOW's stock has severely underperformed the XLF financial-sector ETF over their tenures, while voting FOR Price Lowenstein and Zhak Cohen who joined within the past 24 months and are exempt from the performance trigger, and voting FOR PwC ratification given its short tenure and minimal non-audit fees.

Filing date: March 16, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence