ASANA INC CLASS A (ASAN)

Sector: Information Technology

    Home/Companies/ASAN/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

ASANA INC CLASS A · Meeting: June 8, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

1

Directors AGAINST

2

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Class III Directors

1 FOR/2 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Krista Anderson-CoppermanTSR underperformance trigger: 3-year price return -65.7% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -179.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director joined July 2022, tenure >24 months, 5-year TSR also deeply negative (-80.2%) confirming sustained underperformance

Ms. Anderson-Copperman has served since July 2022 (more than 24 months), and Asana's stock has lost about 66% over three years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained about 114% — a gap of roughly 179 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-point threshold that triggers a vote against; the 5-year record (-80.2% vs XLK) confirms this is sustained underperformance, not a temporary dip, so no mitigant applies.

✗ AGAINST
Sydney CareyTSR underperformance trigger: 3-year price return -65.7% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -179.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director joined July 2019, tenure well over 24 months, 5-year TSR also deeply negative (-80.2%) confirming sustained underperformance

Ms. Carey has served since July 2019 (well over 24 months) and Asana's stock has lost about 66% over three years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained about 114% — a gap of roughly 179 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-point threshold; the 5-year record (-80.2% vs XLK) confirms sustained underperformance with no mitigating improvement, so the vote against stands.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Dan Rogers

Mr. Rogers joined as CEO and director in July 2025, less than 24 months before this meeting, so he is exempt from the stock performance trigger under our policy; he brings relevant technology leadership experience and was newly appointed to lead the company's turnaround.

Two of the three Class III nominees (Anderson-Copperman and Carey) trigger the stock performance threshold — Asana's shares have fallen about 66% over three years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained roughly 114%, a gap of approximately 179 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point policy threshold for companies with negative absolute three-year returns; the five-year record (-80.2%) confirms this is not a temporary trough. New CEO Dan Rogers is exempt from the trigger given his tenure of less than 24 months.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Dustin Moskovitz

Total Comp

$1

Prior Support

99%%

The CEO listed in the compensation database is Dustin Moskovitz, whose total compensation for fiscal year 2026 was $1 — essentially zero — because he voluntarily waived all cash and equity pay while serving as CEO, which is far below any benchmark and raises no overpayment concern. The broader named executive officer program is transitioning toward a pay-for-performance structure with the introduction of performance stock awards and an annual bonus tied to revenue targets for the new CEO Dan Rogers, and prior-year shareholder support was an exceptionally high 99%, indicating no unresolved shareholder concerns. While Asana's stock has significantly underperformed peers, the CEO's pay of $1 means there is no misalignment between pay and performance for the highest-paid executive, and the overall compensation structure passes the policy screens.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$2,332,000

Non-Audit Fees

$202,000

Non-audit fees (tax fees of $200,000 plus other fees of $2,000, totaling $202,000) represent about 8.7% of audit fees ($2,332,000), well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; PwC is a Big 4 firm appropriate for Asana's size; auditor tenure is not disclosed in the proxy so the tenure trigger cannot fire, and no restatements are noted.

Overall Assessment

This is a three-proposal annual meeting ballot; the most significant issue is the severe and sustained stock underperformance — Asana shares have lost about 66% over three years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained roughly 114% — which triggers votes against the two longer-tenured Class III director nominees while newly appointed CEO Dan Rogers is exempt. The say-on-pay and auditor ratification proposals both pass policy screens cleanly, supported by the outgoing CEO's $1 salary and a low non-audit fee ratio of under 9%.

Filing date: April 20, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence