ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC (ACAD)

Sector: Health Care

    Home/Companies/ACAD/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC · Meeting: May 29, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

AGAINST

Director Elections

Election of Directors — Class I Nominees

3 FOR
✓ FOR
James M. Daly

Daly has served since January 2016 and brings extensive biopharma commercial leadership experience; the 3-year TSR gap versus the company-disclosed peer group is -16.9pp, which is below the 35pp threshold required to trigger an against vote for a company with low-positive absolute TSR, so no performance flag applies.

✓ FOR
Edmund P. Harrigan, M.D.

Harrigan has served since November 2015 and brings deep pharmaceutical regulatory and clinical development expertise; the 3-year TSR gap versus the company-disclosed peer group is -16.9pp, below the 35pp trigger threshold, so no performance flag applies.

✓ FOR
Adora Ndu, Pharm.D., J.D.

Ndu joined in October 2022 — approximately 42 months before this meeting — and brings relevant biopharma regulatory expertise; the 3-year TSR gap versus the company-disclosed peer group is -16.9pp, below the 35pp trigger threshold, so no performance flag applies.

All three Class I nominees pass every policy screen: the company's 3-year stock return gap versus its own disclosed peer group (-16.9pp) is below the 35pp threshold that would trigger against votes for a company with low-positive absolute 3-year TSR (+9.7%); no director is overboarded; all are independent; and each brings demonstrable biopharma industry expertise. Vote FOR all three nominees.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Catherine Owen

Total Comp

$8,256,518

Prior Support

98%%

CEO Catherine Owen Adams received total compensation of approximately $8.26 million in 2025, which is reasonable for the CEO of a $3.7 billion commercial-stage biopharma company and does not appear to exceed the policy's +20% individual CEO benchmark threshold. The compensation structure is heavily weighted toward variable pay — approximately 89% of the CEO's reported pay was performance-linked (annual bonus plus equity awards) — well above the 50-60% minimum the policy requires. The annual cash incentive was tied to objective, pre-established corporate goals scored at 110% of target based on genuine achievement across R&D and operational metrics, and the long-term equity program includes performance stock awards that vest based on relative total shareholder return versus biotech peers, providing meaningful pay-for-performance alignment. Shareholders gave the 2024 program 98% support, and the structure has not materially changed in ways that would reverse that judgment.

Auditor Ratification

✗ AGAINST

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

11 yrs

Audit Fees

$1,742,205

Non-Audit Fees

$1,100,098

non audit fee ratio exceeds 50 percent

Ernst & Young has audited Acadia since March 2015 — roughly 11 years — which is well below the 25-year tenure trigger, and the firm is a Big 4 auditor appropriate for a $3.7 billion company. However, non-audit fees (tax preparation fees of $1,000,098 plus audit-related fees of $100,098 = $1,100,098) represent approximately 63% of core audit fees ($1,742,205), exceeding the 50% threshold that raises independence concerns under the policy. Because the non-audit relationship has grown large enough relative to the audit work to create a potential conflict, the policy requires a vote against ratification.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Acadia Pharmaceuticals annual meeting presents four proposals; all three Class I director nominees earn FOR votes as the company's peer-relative underperformance (-16.9pp vs. peer median) falls short of the 35pp trigger, and the Say on Pay program earns a FOR on the strength of its heavily variable pay structure and 98% prior-year support. The sole against determination is on auditor ratification, where non-audit fees paid to Ernst & Young represent approximately 63% of audit fees — above the 50% independence threshold — despite the firm's otherwise appropriate tenure and Big 4 credentials.

Filing date: April 23, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

42 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

ALKSAlkermes
ALKSAlkermes
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics
APLSApellis Pharmaceuticals
APLSApellis Pharmaceuticals
AXSMAxsome Therapeutics
AXSMAxsome Therapeutics
BCRXBiocryst Pharmaceuticals
BCRXBiocryst Pharmaceuticals
BPMCBlueprint Medicines
BPMCBlueprint Medicines
CPRXCatalyst Pharmaceuticals
CORTCorcept Therapeutics
CORTCorcept Therapeutics
DVAXDynavax Technologies
EXELExelixis
EXELExelixis
HRMYHarmony Biosciences
INSMInsmed
INSMInsmed
ITCIIntra-Cellular Therapies
ITCIIntra-Cellular Therapies
IONSIonis Pharmaceuticals
IONSIonis Pharmaceuticals
IRWDIronwood Pharmaceuticals
JAZZJazz Pharmaceuticals
JAZZJazz Pharmaceuticals
NBIXNeurocrine Biosciences
NBIXNeurocrine Biosciences
PCRXPacira BioSciences
PCRXPacira BioSciences
PTCTPTC Therapeutics
PTCTPTC Therapeutics
RYTMRhythm Pharmaceuticals
SAGESage Therapeutics
SAGESage Therapeutics
SRPTSarepta Therapeutics
SUPNSupernus Pharmaceuticals
SUPNSupernus Pharmaceuticals
RAREUltragenyx
RAREUltragenyx