ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC (ACAD)
Sector: Health Care
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC · Meeting: May 29, 2026
Directors FOR
3
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
AGAINST
Director Elections
Election of Directors — Class I Nominees
Daly has served since January 2016 and brings extensive biopharma commercial leadership experience; the 3-year TSR gap versus the company-disclosed peer group is -16.9pp, which is below the 35pp threshold required to trigger an against vote for a company with low-positive absolute TSR, so no performance flag applies.
Harrigan has served since November 2015 and brings deep pharmaceutical regulatory and clinical development expertise; the 3-year TSR gap versus the company-disclosed peer group is -16.9pp, below the 35pp trigger threshold, so no performance flag applies.
Ndu joined in October 2022 — approximately 42 months before this meeting — and brings relevant biopharma regulatory expertise; the 3-year TSR gap versus the company-disclosed peer group is -16.9pp, below the 35pp trigger threshold, so no performance flag applies.
All three Class I nominees pass every policy screen: the company's 3-year stock return gap versus its own disclosed peer group (-16.9pp) is below the 35pp threshold that would trigger against votes for a company with low-positive absolute 3-year TSR (+9.7%); no director is overboarded; all are independent; and each brings demonstrable biopharma industry expertise. Vote FOR all three nominees.
Say on Pay
✓ FORCEO
Catherine Owen
Total Comp
$8,256,518
Prior Support
98%%
CEO Catherine Owen Adams received total compensation of approximately $8.26 million in 2025, which is reasonable for the CEO of a $3.7 billion commercial-stage biopharma company and does not appear to exceed the policy's +20% individual CEO benchmark threshold. The compensation structure is heavily weighted toward variable pay — approximately 89% of the CEO's reported pay was performance-linked (annual bonus plus equity awards) — well above the 50-60% minimum the policy requires. The annual cash incentive was tied to objective, pre-established corporate goals scored at 110% of target based on genuine achievement across R&D and operational metrics, and the long-term equity program includes performance stock awards that vest based on relative total shareholder return versus biotech peers, providing meaningful pay-for-performance alignment. Shareholders gave the 2024 program 98% support, and the structure has not materially changed in ways that would reverse that judgment.
Auditor Ratification
✗ AGAINSTAuditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Tenure
11 yrs
Audit Fees
$1,742,205
Non-Audit Fees
$1,100,098
Ernst & Young has audited Acadia since March 2015 — roughly 11 years — which is well below the 25-year tenure trigger, and the firm is a Big 4 auditor appropriate for a $3.7 billion company. However, non-audit fees (tax preparation fees of $1,000,098 plus audit-related fees of $100,098 = $1,100,098) represent approximately 63% of core audit fees ($1,742,205), exceeding the 50% threshold that raises independence concerns under the policy. Because the non-audit relationship has grown large enough relative to the audit work to create a potential conflict, the policy requires a vote against ratification.
Overall Assessment
The 2026 Acadia Pharmaceuticals annual meeting presents four proposals; all three Class I director nominees earn FOR votes as the company's peer-relative underperformance (-16.9pp vs. peer median) falls short of the 35pp trigger, and the Say on Pay program earns a FOR on the strength of its heavily variable pay structure and 98% prior-year support. The sole against determination is on auditor ratification, where non-audit fees paid to Ernst & Young represent approximately 63% of audit fees — above the 50% independence threshold — despite the firm's otherwise appropriate tenure and Big 4 credentials.
Compensation Peer Group
42 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing